In which context might passive voice be more appropriate?

Passive voice is often more appropriate in contexts where the doer of the action is unknown or not important to the information being conveyed. Using passive construction shifts the focus from the subject who is performing the action to the action itself or its recipient. This is especially useful when the identity of the doer is irrelevant or when it is more important to emphasize the action rather than the actor.

For instance, in scientific writing or reports where the results are paramount, the lack of emphasis on who conducted the study can help maintain an objective tone. A sentence like "The experiment was conducted" highlights the experiment rather than the researcher, which might be more fitting in such contexts.

In contrast, other contexts such as persuasive essays, personal tones, and speeches generally benefit from active voice, where clarity and engagement with the audience are prioritized. This is because active voice tends to be more direct and vigorous, which helps maintain interest and clarity in those formats.